As the dominant discourse would have it, the economic world is a pure and perfect order, implacably unrolling the logic of its predictable consequences, and prompt to repress all violations by the sanctions that it inflicts, either automatically or - more unusually - through the intermediary of its armed extensions, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the policies they impose: reducing labour costs, reducing public expenditures and making work more flexible. Is the dominant discourse right? What if, in reality, this economic order were no more than the implementation of a utopia - the utopia of neoliberalism - thus converted into a political problem? One that, with the aid of the economic theory that it proclaims, succeeds in conceiving of itself as the scientific description of reality?
This tutelary theory is a pure mathematical fiction. From the start it has been founded on a formidable abstraction. For, in the name of a narrow and strict conception of rationality as individual rationality, it brackets the economic and social conditions of rational orientations and the economic and social structures that are the condition of their application.
To give the measure of this omission, it is enough to think just of the educational system. Education is never taken account of as such at a time when it plays a determining role in the production of goods and services as in the production of the producers themselves. From this sort of original sin, inscribed in the Walrasian myth (1) of "pure theory", flow all of the deficiencies and faults of the discipline of economics and the fatal obstinacy with which it attaches itself to the arbitrary opposition which it induces, through its mere existence, between a properly economic logic, based on competition and efficiency, and social logic, which is subject to the rule of fairness.
That said, this "theory" that is desocialised and dehistoricised at its roots has, today more than ever, the means of making itself true and empirically verifiable. In effect, neoliberal discourse is not just one discourse among many. Rather, it is a "strong discourse" - the way psychiatric discourse is in an asylum, in Erving Goffman's analysis (2). It is so strong and so hard to combat only because it has on its side all of the forces of a world of relations of forces, a world that it contributes to making what it is. It does this most notably by orienting the economic choices of those who dominate economic relationships. It thus adds its own symbolic force to these relations of forces. In the name of this scientific programme, converted into a plan of political action, an immense political project
The essence of neoliberalism
进修社
人气:2.61W
今日热门
- 1Take Care of the Interviewers
- 2The Eight Types of Interview Questions
- 3One Side of the Case
- 4The Structure of an Interview
- 5Discussion about the Mechanism of C
- 6For the League of Nations
- 7The Name of a Poet
- 8Profiles of the Chinese Pig Industry
- 9the important of a second language
- 10The cost of marriage笑话
- 11Impulsive Control of the Passive co
- 12The factory director of English resume
- 13Cover letter the Department of Medicine
- 14Civil engineers of the cover letter
- 15Statement on the Articles of Impeachment
周排行榜
- 1The Seven Cs of Business Letter Writing
- 2The Design of USB Video Device
- 3The Colors of the Rainbow考研英语作文
- 4观后感:Front of the Class
- 5Great Depressions of the 20th Centu
- 6Biographical notes on the preservation of equipment
- 7Brainstorming as Part of the Negotiation
- 8The Power of a Good Cover Letter
- 9Art Paper The Chain Of Art
- 10Containerisation in the ports of Vietnam
- 11The Translation of English Idioms and Proverbs
- 12The structure of Chinese Letter Writing
- 13Profiles of the Chinese Pig Industr
- 14Human resources director of the resume
- 15The design of soft Van CV